Photo by Arfa Griffiths/West Ham United via Getty Images

Juventus star Wojtek Szczesny savages Samir Nasri and West Ham in candid interview

West Ham United and new star Samir Nasri have been savaged in a candid interview with a Juventus star.

Former Arsneal goalkeeper turned Juve number one Wojtek Szczesny is not backward in coming forward.

The ‘keeper has some strident views.

And he was airing them when he gave a candid interview to a Polish YouTube channel over the weekend.

Photo by Jose Breton NurPhoto via Getty Images

RONALDO NEEDS TO STOP WHINING.

Szczesny goes on the attack

Speaking to Foot Truck in Polish, former Gunner Szczesny told West Ham fans they have a bad apple in Samir Nasri.

He also told the Hammers they should count themselves lucky to have injury crock Jack Wilshere.

“He (Nasri) always thought he’s some kind of gangster,”  Szczesny told Foot Truck.

Photo by John Patrick Fletcher Action Plus via Getty Images

‘Nasri thinks he is a gangster’

“Everyone has this colleague at school, who had strong and big friends and it made him think he’s cool. In Poland there is saying – to fart higher than your bottom.

“My best friend (was Wilshere), next to Krychowiak. At my wedding he got so drunk. we were looking for him everywhere for 2 hours and found him sleeping in bushes.

“One injury, never fully cured caused next and then next. One of the greatest talent i met. Because of injuries he now plays in West Ham not big European club.”

Photo by Stuart MacFarlane Arsenal FC via Getty Images

Comments ironic

Szczesny’s comments are ironic given Nasri has looked a changed man since signing for the club in January.

The Frenchman has admitted he has matured after an 18 month ban from the beautiful game.

And he has impressed for the Hammers, changing the game when he came on as a substitute against Huddersfield turning a 3-1 deficit into a remarkable 4-3 win.

Wilshere may be his best friend. He may have immense quality. But it matters little if you can’t stay fit for more than a couple of games to prove it.

LOGIN to Comment
LOGIN to Comment